-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
[DNM/Temp] use fast benchmark in staking election verifier #10013
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: kiz-epmb-poll
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
/cmd bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend |
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend" has started 🚀 See logs here |
…t_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend'
Command "bench --pallet pallet_election_provider_multi_block pallet_election_provider_multi_block_signed pallet_election_provider_multi_block_verifier pallet_election_provider_multi_block_unsigned --runtime asset-hub-westend" has finished ✅ See logs here Subweight results:
Command output:✅ Successful benchmarks of runtimes/pallets: |
I believe we should still benchmark unsigned pallet |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All weight diffs look small, good.
Ah yeah, great point. Although, this benchmark is |
Honestly I don't like the fact that we had to use the |
…/polkadot-sdk into kiz-epmb-fast-benches-on-poll
yes, definitely so I think the quick and dirty solver is a neat approach. That said, I also agree it would be nice to be able to specify solver with more granularity |
gonna merge this actually after the base branch is merged, or merge it into base if being lazy. |
On top of just to see the weight diff with different bench config
Solving issues in polkadot-fellows/runtimes#959 and polkadot-fellows/runtimes#963